
|
| Comments
(10) Friday, July 27,
2001, 12:09
While I lie in wait for Trebz to appear so I can bend his
ear about the guides` site (expect the new one to appear
very soon), I`ve decided to have a go at updating my
column.
You may of heard Prince Charles comments about
children and games:
"One of the
great battles we face today is to persuade our children
away from the computer games towards what can only be
described as worthwhile books,"
Everyone
is allowed to say what they think, but what did Prince Charles base this
assumption on? Did he spend a day hammering away at
Quake3? Did he ask someone
to send him a few consoles or maybe a PC and a few games
so he can see what it`s all about? Or did he walk past
Prince William who was
hunched over his console and think, "One is being horribly warped by the
bright colours and loud noises. Best get him out
watching the trooping of the colour, or reading a good
book instead" (thanks Mikeybear
;)). Who knows? A good bet is he read a few
stories about computer games (probably from America) and
made up his mind that it was all bad, and came to the
conclusion that books still rule the world. I doubt his
view was based on facts.
What made me laugh is no
one seemed to care what he said. Only the media seemed
to by blowing it all out of proportion (as they usually
do). They tried to look at the reasons for his comments.
To top it all a number of games company`s seemed to
panic, and sent him a box full of sport and educational
games to ... well for what ever reason you can be sure
that he did not touch them.
Back to his
comments. The greatest battle today is nothing to do
with computer games. These have been around for ages.
The biggest battle has got to be the way children see
society. It seems every kid wants things "NOW" and as
cheap as possible... I`ll stop here because this is a
column about gaming and I don`t want to go on about my
views of the world today :).
Computer games are
worthwhile as are books. In fact they are similar in
many ways. Both have their strong points and of course
negative. Think about it. In the past someone reading a
book all day might be seen as intelligent, but they
would be stuck glued to the pages of their book. Now if
it was a gamer, they will have a game and be glued to
their screen. They can take breaks. Talk to others who
have played the game, be this on the internet or in the
school playground. I guess in the old days people would
do the same about books, but do they now? There are
clubs who meet to talk about books. Reading classes
e.t.c, but for entertainment value books are mostly read
alone.
Books teach good english. Aid grammar and
spelling, and allow the reader to think while
visualising images in their minds while they read. Games
teach you so many things it`s impossible to list them
all. So I`ll quote from an article in the Sunday Times (You can read the
full article here):
The research, funded by the government`s
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), challenges
the common view of computer gamers as "geeks" who cut
themselves off from the world and develop few social or
wider academic skills. Instead, it suggests that playing
computer games could sharpen young people`s mental
agility to a level superior to that of previous
generations by exposing them to intense stimuli from a
young age.
"People who play games regularly seem
to develop a mental state that we have seen before only
in serious athletes or professionals such as astronauts,
whose life depends on concentration and co-ordination,"
said Jo Bryce, who led the research. "Their minds and
bodies work together much better than those of most
other people."
Mark
Griffiths, a psychologist at Nottingham Trent University
and an expert in computer gaming, found recently in a
study of 800 children that those who played games
"moderately"- no more than two hours a day-tended to do
more sport than those who played no games. They had more
friends, were better adjusted and tended to read
more.
So games are not all bad. This
article sums it up nicely. At the end of the day if a
kid is playing games, but is also out socialising i.e.
not roaming the streets, but taking part in activities,
they will remain healthy and sound. This is a good
point. If there were no games there would no doubt be
more kids on the streets saying "I`m sooo bored. Lets
go smash something".
Games not only help you
to relax (students use them to take their mind off the
stresses of school work), but they teach as well. I
found out more about the rules of sports from playing a
few games. American football confused me when I watched
it. After a few games of John Madden on the mega drive I
knew the rules off by heart and when I saw it on the TV
I knew what was happening and enjoyed the sport more
(this was back in my teenage years. Nowadays I`m into
proper football, or soccer, as the Americans like to
call it ;)).
Now can someone be given a game, and
within a short space of time improve their knowledge or
skill? Time for a test I think....
Right I
play pool, well I`ll rephrase that I "try" to play pool.
I`m not that good at it. Most shots when they do go in
are fluky, and the only thing I seem to be good at is
snookering an opponent, which is fun, but prolongs the
result which is me losing.
I only play for a few
laughs, and I prefer the beer and chatting with mates
over being stuck at a pool table, but a friend of mine
has gotten the "I 0wn you all" attitude so I think it`s
about time someone knocked him off his high
horse.
As the saying goes "Practice makes
perfect", but I`ve played enough games and my problem
seems to be a lack of concentration as well as not
knowing the angles to well, so I`ve bought a copy of
Virtual Pool 3 which has
everything a pool player would need. Including a hot
chick called "Jeanette Lee" showing you the ropes in the
videos.
I`m not going to sit here and spend hours
playing the game, but I`ll pick it up now and then and
practice my shots. Then come next week I`ll see how my
game has improved.
There are some good and bad
points about practicing via a game:
Good: I can
keep practicing without looking like a prat when I
miss an easy shot. It will teach me well for the real
thing (I hope). The videos are good so instead of me
forking out money to pay someone to teach me, I get a
pro pool player "Jeanette Lee" showing me what I need
to know. Last good point is there`s no cheesy bar
music :). Bad:
No beer, no socialising. The bad points
are gone once I enter the pub and play for real :). The
question is will my game improve? Will I ever stop
launching balls of the table (*joke* I`m not that bad
:P)? Will I knock my mate down a peg or two? Find out in
my next column update :).
email SAS
|

|